Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 18:21:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E24A8449B228FFEC053FFB3839D7102CF976CAB5726CB4B06A5111F40DFF44F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. The post implies that the men faced no criminal proceedings, which is not correct and the wider context of the Rotherham CSE scandal is important for people not familiar with the story. Whilst OP is factual in its statement the purpose of CN is to provide context. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874934439936991343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E24A8449B228FFEC053FFB3839D7102CF976CAB5726CB4B06A5111F40DFF44F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1735928504646
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1874934439936991343E24A8449B228FFEC053FFB3839D7102CF976CAB5726CB4B06A5111F40DFF44F7