Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 18:33:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F3092E41144BAFF8060F9A180B9ABC74F96E1F0A5CEDFC19C72A43E55903AA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. The post implies that the men faced no criminal proceedings, which is not correct and the wider context of the Rotherham CSE scandal is important for people not familiar with the story. Whilst OP is factual in its statement the purpose of CN is to provide context. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874934439936991343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F3092E41144BAFF8060F9A180B9ABC74F96E1F0A5CEDFC19C72A43E55903AA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1735929234179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18749344399369913433F3092E41144BAFF8060F9A180B9ABC74F96E1F0A5CEDFC19C72A43E55903AA6