Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 14:39:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15EFC24D2CF7143A7A19E9F71398423C47157DA9A2B4EE771B19E9F1622DE1EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. The post implies that the men faced no criminal proceedings, which is not correct and the wider context of the Rotherham CSE scandal is important for people not familiar with the story. Whilst OP is factual in its statement the purpose of CN is to provide context. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874934439936991343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15EFC24D2CF7143A7A19E9F71398423C47157DA9A2B4EE771B19E9F1622DE1EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1735915150868
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187493443993699134315EFC24D2CF7143A7A19E9F71398423C47157DA9A2B4EE771B19E9F1622DE1EF