Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 23:17:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14537B666A1BE14016084F9432A6393B7898629D36DC4C6B1F715C348F0154C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Não cabe à um ministro do Supremo Tribunal Federal emitir opinião ou indicar investigação. Qualquer juiz precisa manter imparcialidade e tomar decisão constitucional. No caso do ministro Gilmar Mendes, apenas em casos que chegam para ele, no Supremo. https://brasilescola-uol-com-br.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/brasilescola.uol.com.br/amp/politica/supremo-tribunal-federal-stf.htm?amp_js_v=a9&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM=#amp_ct=1735773279052&amp_tf=De%20%251%24s&aoh=17357732471133&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fbrasilescola.uol.com.br%2Fpolitica%2Fsupremo-tribunal-federal-stf.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874595338662629640
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14537B666A1BE14016084F9432A6393B7898629D36DC4C6B1F715C348F0154C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1735773467541
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187459533866262964014537B666A1BE14016084F9432A6393B7898629D36DC4C6B1F715C348F0154C3