Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-02 18:10:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F63E1A980C0CF5A1CDAFAF62B6DC81D1EBEB076B3FD9D074EF5FEB63B536C12
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. If the data provided in the original post is correct, there is no need for them to delve into the detail as to why China has such low numbers.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874498755191271574
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F63E1A980C0CF5A1CDAFAF62B6DC81D1EBEB076B3FD9D074EF5FEB63B536C12
  • createdAtMillis - 1735841400473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18744987551912715746F63E1A980C0CF5A1CDAFAF62B6DC81D1EBEB076B3FD9D074EF5FEB63B536C12