Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 19:52:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F8321CFAFFF7ED8DC2D6A3A59922C0F34925B493A8E80ECB92F58FE3C0E97F5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note by magnanimous walnut hawk is not necessary. The image clearly states exactly what was repealed. That part is, in fact, highlighted. The "at all" at the end implies that this is the last part of income that had been taxed. There is no misinformation in this image. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgLvHrDXAAAtcxb?format=jpg&name=orig

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874487392771465467
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F8321CFAFFF7ED8DC2D6A3A59922C0F34925B493A8E80ECB92F58FE3C0E97F5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1735761162053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1874487392771465467F8321CFAFFF7ED8DC2D6A3A59922C0F34925B493A8E80ECB92F58FE3C0E97F5A