Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 16:22:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2162CF5ECEDD63CE0B70D3A7B0B0B4F7F1F2AC32900F6E94AB03AD66C6FF27A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note by magnanimous walnut hawk is not necessary. The image clearly states exactly what was repealed. That part is, in fact, highlighted. The "at all" at the end implies that this is the last part of income that had been taxed. There is no misinformation in this image. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgLvHrDXAAAtcxb?format=jpg&name=orig

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874487392771465467
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2162CF5ECEDD63CE0B70D3A7B0B0B4F7F1F2AC32900F6E94AB03AD66C6FF27A
  • createdAtMillis - 1735748578678
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1874487392771465467F2162CF5ECEDD63CE0B70D3A7B0B0B4F7F1F2AC32900F6E94AB03AD66C6FF27A