Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 19:20:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D608B9E094BFA3F086D54288BECF6B4AD7C4CB9AA27A8568B8D257CD079AD51
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note by magnanimous walnut hawk is not necessary. The image clearly states exactly what was repealed. That part is, in fact, highlighted. The "at all" at the end implies that this is the last part of income that had been taxed. There is no misinformation in this image. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgLvHrDXAAAtcxb?format=jpg&name=orig

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874487392771465467
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D608B9E094BFA3F086D54288BECF6B4AD7C4CB9AA27A8568B8D257CD079AD51
  • createdAtMillis - 1735759207692
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18744873927714654679D608B9E094BFA3F086D54288BECF6B4AD7C4CB9AA27A8568B8D257CD079AD51