Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-02 00:24:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F9FE6FCAAB9036175B73328CFC11F229B2185D0B95D3EC1B020FC14E015B845
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note by magnanimous walnut hawk is not necessary. The image clearly states exactly what was repealed. That part is, in fact, highlighted. The "at all" at the end implies that this is the last part of income that had been taxed. There is no misinformation in this image. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgLvHrDXAAAtcxb?format=jpg&name=orig

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874487392771465467
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F9FE6FCAAB9036175B73328CFC11F229B2185D0B95D3EC1B020FC14E015B845
  • createdAtMillis - 1735777470080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18744873927714654678F9FE6FCAAB9036175B73328CFC11F229B2185D0B95D3EC1B020FC14E015B845