Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 16:39:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18C0A36A77A3BEE256959E31A73B4C8B926B3C7206B5C34ADF673110CAD2FC7F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note by magnanimous walnut hawk is not necessary. The image clearly states exactly what was repealed. That part is, in fact, highlighted. The "at all" at the end implies that this is the last part of income that had been taxed. There is no misinformation in this image. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GgLvHrDXAAAtcxb?format=jpg&name=orig

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874487392771465467
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18C0A36A77A3BEE256959E31A73B4C8B926B3C7206B5C34ADF673110CAD2FC7F
  • createdAtMillis - 1735749581241
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187448739277146546718C0A36A77A3BEE256959E31A73B4C8B926B3C7206B5C34ADF673110CAD2FC7F