Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 23:33:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4360F4FF06EDD592556BA4067322D904F6F264F961BF35C56622344117C1FBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

הטענה כי הסנגור "הוכיח" כי הסרטון מבושל היא טענה שקרנית בדיון בבג"צ לא ניתן להוכיח זאת אלא רק בהליך הפלילי, הטענה של הסנגור נשארת טענה של גורם בעל עניין ולא יותר מזה. https://m.maariv.co.il/news/law/article-1160148

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874433989240299833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4360F4FF06EDD592556BA4067322D904F6F264F961BF35C56622344117C1FBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1735774428588
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1874433989240299833F4360F4FF06EDD592556BA4067322D904F6F264F961BF35C56622344117C1FBE