Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 17:19:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE65E12531C8B953C07C8AE17E18B104DFBE0A88F03DDD9B9BCE49142B4E297F
Participant Details

Original Note:

הטענה כי הסנגור "הוכיח" כי הסרטון מבושל היא טענה שקרנית בדיון בבג"צ לא ניתן להוכיח זאת אלא רק בהליך הפלילי, הטענה של הסנגור נשארת טענה של גורם בעל עניין ולא יותר מזה. https://m.maariv.co.il/news/law/article-1160148

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874433989240299833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EE65E12531C8B953C07C8AE17E18B104DFBE0A88F03DDD9B9BCE49142B4E297F
  • createdAtMillis - 1735751946544
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1874433989240299833EE65E12531C8B953C07C8AE17E18B104DFBE0A88F03DDD9B9BCE49142B4E297F