Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 14:10:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B64B66EC92B5477A668B511810252B7BB8504A70C13892AE42025324CADFB069
Participant Details

Original Note:

הטענה כי הסנגור "הוכיח" כי הסרטון מבושל היא טענה שקרנית בדיון בבג"צ לא ניתן להוכיח זאת אלא רק בהליך הפלילי, הטענה של הסנגור נשארת טענה של גורם בעל עניין ולא יותר מזה. https://m.maariv.co.il/news/law/article-1160148

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874433989240299833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B64B66EC92B5477A668B511810252B7BB8504A70C13892AE42025324CADFB069
  • createdAtMillis - 1735740649791
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1874433989240299833B64B66EC92B5477A668B511810252B7BB8504A70C13892AE42025324CADFB069