Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 13:59:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 99D02CA7B203611504F143AF7B51441D303616EA304C0F78716A5405D462DD8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

הטענה כי הסנגור "הוכיח" כי הסרטון מבושל היא טענה שקרנית בדיון בבג"צ לא ניתן להוכיח זאת אלא רק בהליך הפלילי, הטענה של הסנגור נשארת טענה של גורם בעל עניין ולא יותר מזה. https://m.maariv.co.il/news/law/article-1160148

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874433989240299833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 99D02CA7B203611504F143AF7B51441D303616EA304C0F78716A5405D462DD8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1735739945464
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187443398924029983399D02CA7B203611504F143AF7B51441D303616EA304C0F78716A5405D462DD8F