Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 12:52:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Seems that The New York Times edited the article, but there are still paragraphs that match what is shown on the screen. So, the information is not fake, just outdated.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874417677315322280
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1735735932965
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1874417677315322280C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD