Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 22:14:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4941D0AB1FEF572D5936DA56C2C6466AF024A7AABFE5813FC6E706BDBF221CF3
Participant Details

Original Note:

産経新聞の質問は、夫婦別姓制度の下で子供と両親や兄弟間で名字が異なる可能性について賛否を問うものであり、反対論を主張しているわけではありません。設問はその状況を説明したうえで回答を求めています。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20250101-L3VK2UL4H5EMJPW6X5DVUGNXJQ/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874367641940615212
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4941D0AB1FEF572D5936DA56C2C6466AF024A7AABFE5813FC6E706BDBF221CF3
  • createdAtMillis - 1735769691436
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18743676419406152124941D0AB1FEF572D5936DA56C2C6466AF024A7AABFE5813FC6E706BDBF221CF3