Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 10:09:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBE5420E4A8C04AC8C0C8FA1C230A02B22FA78B60EA16952CCD57A63709140CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The selection criteria of the "winner" is inherently flawed, and fails to consider public input, which leads to questioning the credibility of the OCCRP Organization as a possibly corrupt organization in itself. https://x.com/OCCRP/status/1874194700217061862

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874350862228664680
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBE5420E4A8C04AC8C0C8FA1C230A02B22FA78B60EA16952CCD57A63709140CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1735726171546
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1874350862228664680DBE5420E4A8C04AC8C0C8FA1C230A02B22FA78B60EA16952CCD57A63709140CE