Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 00:18:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8DAF568E69F52805160EB25E5717A5A48E8A6B56985206324FC9C124FD85D505
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The user doesn’t claim he was stopped from posting; he says he faced retaliation for his opinions. The email screenshot from X doesn’t explain what rule he broke. Retaliating against contrarian opinions that don’t violate rules is an attack on free speech.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874202392259883010
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8DAF568E69F52805160EB25E5717A5A48E8A6B56985206324FC9C124FD85D505
  • createdAtMillis - 1735690680083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18742023922598830108DAF568E69F52805160EB25E5717A5A48E8A6B56985206324FC9C124FD85D505