Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 06:35:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 070C9C46F843CFBC63FC3B52177EBDFD10A33BCC7E574779BF3E3D391E83E6B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The user doesn’t claim he was stopped from posting; he says he faced retaliation for his opinions. The email screenshot from X doesn’t explain what rule he broke. Retaliating against contrarian opinions that don’t violate rules is an attack on free speech.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874202392259883010
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 070C9C46F843CFBC63FC3B52177EBDFD10A33BCC7E574779BF3E3D391E83E6B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1735713312323
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1874202392259883010070C9C46F843CFBC63FC3B52177EBDFD10A33BCC7E574779BF3E3D391E83E6B0