Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-01 02:18:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96ED76A58A1DDED75265862C60B48F9D780E3DA0A912F70E44DD1C7C89646CAC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- post is not misleading. Other CNs erroneously cite a Forbes article claiming X has deleted a note in the past. Not correct. The note is still there but if notes get rejected by contributors the notes won’t show. Forbes was wrong and had no knowledge as to how CNs work. https://x.com/i/birdwatch/t/1683852156749729793

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874156125009903740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96ED76A58A1DDED75265862C60B48F9D780E3DA0A912F70E44DD1C7C89646CAC
  • createdAtMillis - 1735697896603
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187415612500990374096ED76A58A1DDED75265862C60B48F9D780E3DA0A912F70E44DD1C7C89646CAC