Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 18:32:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65CD44038C0F5DA365C9F5F54F7E6E082C1DED6EDBD61F0924F626A115FBB152
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- post is not misleading. Other CNs erroneously cite a Forbes article claiming X has deleted a note in the past. Not correct. The note is still there but if notes get rejected by contributors the notes won’t show. Forbes was wrong and had no knowledge as to how CNs work. https://x.com/i/birdwatch/t/1683852156749729793

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874156125009903740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65CD44038C0F5DA365C9F5F54F7E6E082C1DED6EDBD61F0924F626A115FBB152
  • createdAtMillis - 1735669958982
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187415612500990374065CD44038C0F5DA365C9F5F54F7E6E082C1DED6EDBD61F0924F626A115FBB152