Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 18:39:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14C5B506B341008FC8DC6323CBF1FA4E5266C229A7D424FF5B9E5C456945014A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- post is not misleading. Other CNs erroneously cite a Forbes article claiming X has deleted a note in the past. Not correct. The note is still there but if notes get rejected by contributors the notes won’t show. Forbes was wrong and had no knowledge as to how CNs work. https://x.com/i/birdwatch/t/1683852156749729793

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1874156125009903740
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14C5B506B341008FC8DC6323CBF1FA4E5266C229A7D424FF5B9E5C456945014A
  • createdAtMillis - 1735670348930
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187415612500990374014C5B506B341008FC8DC6323CBF1FA4E5266C229A7D424FF5B9E5C456945014A