Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 20:30:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03BBEF97A4C664FF3DD38546DA13B9C1B9081E12CEA7FC423AA99869C63EEED1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Quarks belegt seine Quellen in dem von Brechtken geteilten Bild. Diese beruhen auf mehrere Studien und ist somit kein Glaubenskonstrukt sondern Tatsachen durch Peer Verfahren bestätigt. https://www.ub.hu-berlin.de/de/bibliotheksglossar/peer-review-verfahren#:~:text=Peer%2DReview%2DVerfahren-,Bewertung%20einer%20wissenschaftlichen%20Arbeit%20durch%20unabh%C3%A4ngige%20Gutachter%2C%20Wissenschaftler%20des%20selben,von%20Beitr%C3%A4gen%20in%20wissenschaftlichen%20Zeitschriften.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1874141195620016234
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 03BBEF97A4C664FF3DD38546DA13B9C1B9081E12CEA7FC423AA99869C63EEED1
createdAtMillis - 1735677058226
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 187414119562001623403BBEF97A4C664FF3DD38546DA13B9C1B9081E12CEA7FC423AA99869C63EEED1