Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 06:18:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 164F6B9509B083C3D1C00F75E558DB8937D989280A334EA5F0DEB8383E0EE17F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - completely subjective + speculative. also tweets are not an academic source for you to cite information from. take this garbage to the replies and stop abusing the system

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873861197793001877
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 164F6B9509B083C3D1C00F75E558DB8937D989280A334EA5F0DEB8383E0EE17F
  • createdAtMillis - 1735625909613
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1873861197793001877164F6B9509B083C3D1C00F75E558DB8937D989280A334EA5F0DEB8383E0EE17F