Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 00:01:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN OP is opinion Claim "123 charged with using a deadly weapon" is false, contradicted by source "charged" does not mean "guilty" Some argue DOJ has been "overcharging" defendants, and this is supported by at least one SCOTUS ruling so far. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3122632/doj-dropping-most-jan-6-obstruction-charges/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873856125751464445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
  • createdAtMillis - 1735603303591
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1873856125751464445F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D