Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 04:28:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0136F8FF678723F9E739730F3E10A7641759E357A146A6113D241D5DFFE0FD8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN OP is opinion Claim "123 charged with using a deadly weapon" is false, contradicted by source "charged" does not mean "guilty" Some argue DOJ has been "overcharging" defendants, and this is supported by at least one SCOTUS ruling so far. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3122632/doj-dropping-most-jan-6-obstruction-charges/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873856125751464445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0136F8FF678723F9E739730F3E10A7641759E357A146A6113D241D5DFFE0FD8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1735619331163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18738561257514644450136F8FF678723F9E739730F3E10A7641759E357A146A6113D241D5DFFE0FD8C