Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 10:57:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71
Participant Details

Original Note:

Die hier gezeigte Konversation mit ChatGPT ist fake! ChatGPT gibt keine politischen Wahlempfehlungen, was sich auch mit Kopieren des hier verwendeten prompts ganz einfach nachprüfen lässt. Hier zwei Beispiele aus den Kommentaren zum Beweis: https://x.com/Tana_Ria_/status/1873787368777670908?t=s6rOSxcgSF8QCt3PfjcDSw&s=19 https://x.com/granqvist_12/status/1873759079111487823?t=s6rOSxcgSF8QCt3PfjcDSw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1873820449592741904
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71
createdAtMillis - 1735642644892
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1873820449592741904A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71