Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 01:02:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93BD88CF0FD9B85C6B51379D85A52A5C40B7ED28E35151F3A1B884FBCAA62E6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This graphic is based on widely discredited work by Charles Murray. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.22021 https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Famp0001228

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873811224162447708
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93BD88CF0FD9B85C6B51379D85A52A5C40B7ED28E35151F3A1B884FBCAA62E6A
  • createdAtMillis - 1735606939021
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187381122416244770893BD88CF0FD9B85C6B51379D85A52A5C40B7ED28E35151F3A1B884FBCAA62E6A