Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 01:42:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44F4938A11019976284B2E59FBAABE5A3C4DFE4892F15B3F26AE93BFCB804BD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This graphic is based on widely discredited work by Charles Murray. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.22021 https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Famp0001228

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873811224162447708
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44F4938A11019976284B2E59FBAABE5A3C4DFE4892F15B3F26AE93BFCB804BD9
  • createdAtMillis - 1737078122639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187381122416244770844F4938A11019976284B2E59FBAABE5A3C4DFE4892F15B3F26AE93BFCB804BD9