Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-30 16:17:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B87C5A431911F16DCB683F1B9E43505B486BC4B42AA267FB12575E3982FFCF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ao contrário do que afirma esta publicação, o caso de Cuca não prescreveu, pois prescrição indica a extinção do dever da condenação por não ser cumprida em tempo hábil. A condenação de Cuca não foi prescrita, e sim ANULADA por revelia e provas não apresentadas. https://ge.globo.com/futebol/times/atletico-mg/noticia/2024/12/29/novo-tecnico-do-atletico-mg-cuca-teve-condenacao-anulada-na-suica-entenda-situacao-juridica.ghtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873745861315862722
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B87C5A431911F16DCB683F1B9E43505B486BC4B42AA267FB12575E3982FFCF5
  • createdAtMillis - 1735575441359
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18737458613158627227B87C5A431911F16DCB683F1B9E43505B486BC4B42AA267FB12575E3982FFCF5