Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-29 22:05:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77BD7EA9FEBA8FD0196D099BCFE5D7274125AD8507E7D7DF0143EE31AE5E1F37
Participant Details

Original Note:

Alegação de culpa exclusiva de terceiro pelo acidente em causa, como excludente de responsabilidade, deve ser afastada, ante a incidência da teoria do risco integral e da responsabilidade objetiva ínsita ao dano ambiental. https://www.stj.jus.br/docs_internet/jurisprudencia/jurisprudenciaemteses/Jurisprudencia%20em%20Teses%20119%20-%20Responsabilidade%20Por%20Dano%20Ambiental.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873487755650490616
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 77BD7EA9FEBA8FD0196D099BCFE5D7274125AD8507E7D7DF0143EE31AE5E1F37
  • createdAtMillis - 1735509940210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187348775565049061677BD7EA9FEBA8FD0196D099BCFE5D7274125AD8507E7D7DF0143EE31AE5E1F37