Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-30 21:29:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5875193E0B319722935D33B8FFD3068168107F91A92000E1C123460CD2D6F7F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Los conflictos de interés se declaran para garantizar transparencia. No invalidan resultados. En vacunas, la evidencia es revisada por expertos y organismos independientes. El caso del antivacunas Andrew Wakefield, con intereses ocultos, es un ejemplo de por qué esto es clave. https://www.nationalgeographic.com.es/ciencia/andrew-wakefield-infame-padre-movimiento-antivacunas_20262

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873433915899216326
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5875193E0B319722935D33B8FFD3068168107F91A92000E1C123460CD2D6F7F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1735594178972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18734339158992163265875193E0B319722935D33B8FFD3068168107F91A92000E1C123460CD2D6F7F8