Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-31 05:54:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3E4CB92EE2D96B740F5C91D1BCE6F56E52AD2F66920E388078C95CFF7E09C65
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed CNs don’t contradict any factual claim by OP. They just highlight aspects of the data to suggest an argument. Arguments belong in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873240985280331845
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3E4CB92EE2D96B740F5C91D1BCE6F56E52AD2F66920E388078C95CFF7E09C65
  • createdAtMillis - 1735624449990
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1873240985280331845C3E4CB92EE2D96B740F5C91D1BCE6F56E52AD2F66920E388078C95CFF7E09C65