Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-30 05:01:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B84D12655BFCBFE0A0077A8521F8798DB76063173E99B1D019467C3D15A790BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

A judge ruled that Phillips was not sanctioned for his political views, but because his content is propaganda in favour of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The judge found that he is for all practical purposes a Russian asset embedded with the Russian military. https://www.brickcourt.co.uk/news/detail/freedom-of-expression-versus-russia-sanctions-administrative-court-rejects-graham-phillips-sanctions-act-challenge

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873083591628099844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B84D12655BFCBFE0A0077A8521F8798DB76063173E99B1D019467C3D15A790BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1735534867617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1873083591628099844B84D12655BFCBFE0A0077A8521F8798DB76063173E99B1D019467C3D15A790BF