Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-29 13:59:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A998E0A9E6EBA305E2B02C85F5F39E2373C98DDEB2C1A8EC5FFD502CF6D586AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

A judge ruled that Phillips was not sanctioned for his political views, but because his content is propaganda in favour of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The judge found that he is for all practical purposes a Russian asset embedded with the Russian military. https://www.brickcourt.co.uk/news/detail/freedom-of-expression-versus-russia-sanctions-administrative-court-rejects-graham-phillips-sanctions-act-challenge

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1873083591628099844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A998E0A9E6EBA305E2B02C85F5F39E2373C98DDEB2C1A8EC5FFD502CF6D586AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1735480756150
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1873083591628099844A998E0A9E6EBA305E2B02C85F5F39E2373C98DDEB2C1A8EC5FFD502CF6D586AD