Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-27 16:00:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB7A2093761A93DD7D6B2A10B2133A53110DA94CD70D089C28A0A8EEFA78D6AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Não se trata de troca de ofensas. A citada acusou o autor do post de “andar com pedófilo”, insinuando que o autor era cúmplice ou concordava com o ato. Sem contexto adicional, esta acusação é passível de análise no âmbito de crimes contra a honra, especialmente o art 139. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/da-difamacao-artigo-139-do-codigo-penal/177896242

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1872623724689514954
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB7A2093761A93DD7D6B2A10B2133A53110DA94CD70D089C28A0A8EEFA78D6AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1735315247626
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1872623724689514954AB7A2093761A93DD7D6B2A10B2133A53110DA94CD70D089C28A0A8EEFA78D6AC