Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-28 03:33:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8342A2BA0A640209D2E91EB1EE2192EC56F169D97F68AF5B794B21D9D3541AB7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Não se trata de troca de ofensas. A citada acusou o autor do post de “andar com pedófilo”, insinuando que o autor era cúmplice ou concordava com o ato. Sem contexto adicional, esta acusação é passível de análise no âmbito de crimes contra a honra, especialmente o art 139. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/da-difamacao-artigo-139-do-codigo-penal/177896242

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1872623724689514954
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8342A2BA0A640209D2E91EB1EE2192EC56F169D97F68AF5B794B21D9D3541AB7
  • createdAtMillis - 1735356796308
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18726237246895149548342A2BA0A640209D2E91EB1EE2192EC56F169D97F68AF5B794B21D9D3541AB7