Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-27 08:46:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48D1851EBD7AB9D358823A140B45EE6531AD094C6DC5D3211E8F80753F3E7221
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the graphics is correct, the conclusion doesn't follow from the data. Consuming regularly news from a platform, doesn't indicate that they also interact with such information. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/ https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/pj_2024-09-17_social-media-news-fact-sheet_0-02/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1872522283786342487
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 48D1851EBD7AB9D358823A140B45EE6531AD094C6DC5D3211E8F80753F3E7221
createdAtMillis - 1735289166325
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 187252228378634248748D1851EBD7AB9D358823A140B45EE6531AD094C6DC5D3211E8F80753F3E7221