Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-27 00:47:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC2967A732E98CFBDDA9A04A3868103D7B0CA5A057C0A2FDA14138DF33166B14
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN OP is opinion. Many CNs claim "revisions" are small part of total jobs, but that's wrong basis to compare when discussing changes to total jobs. If "revisions" of ~1% or less are "small" then so are "gains" of similar magnitude. Just admit accuracy of all of this sucks.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1872338090343236001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CC2967A732E98CFBDDA9A04A3868103D7B0CA5A057C0A2FDA14138DF33166B14
  • createdAtMillis - 1735260421509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1872338090343236001CC2967A732E98CFBDDA9A04A3868103D7B0CA5A057C0A2FDA14138DF33166B14