Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-27 10:54:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1935CEFBE82E40C970FF05C6E28FC36306D9F9C7A64911D0BF05554C1A6AC47F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Il n'est pas étonnant que Cerfia ait partagé un avis négatif vis-à-vis du RN plutôt qu'un avis positif envers quelconque autre organisme politique quand il est beaucoup plus courant de parler de qui on n'aime pas plutôt de qui on soutient. Aucune récupération politique ici

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1872255767618671062
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1935CEFBE82E40C970FF05C6E28FC36306D9F9C7A64911D0BF05554C1A6AC47F
  • createdAtMillis - 1735296848597
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18722557676186710621935CEFBE82E40C970FF05C6E28FC36306D9F9C7A64911D0BF05554C1A6AC47F