Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-26 02:30:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F68AE1EE1E066AE924050EAFEB2F07BCFE5CD5D9C7FED6898A2EBAFE0EEA16C
Participant Details

Original Note:

I can’t say that this list is factual or not and neither can you. Lack of evidence is not evidence. It’s hilarious to me when CNs quote the crooks saying they didn’t do it as somehow being proof. Cheaters and liars always claim innocence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1872070885261156450
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F68AE1EE1E066AE924050EAFEB2F07BCFE5CD5D9C7FED6898A2EBAFE0EEA16C
  • createdAtMillis - 1735180259033
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18720708852611564504F68AE1EE1E066AE924050EAFEB2F07BCFE5CD5D9C7FED6898A2EBAFE0EEA16C