Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-28 03:39:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 29F4D4483F6EE6D7859A1C1ED3DAF8AF4A28E6890C95E548975476B8C29DB5D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

ユーザー性別を女性にしていても、若い薄着の女性写真を使用した包茎手術の広告が複数流れてくる例があります。 投稿者の内容を事実誤認とは言えません。 また、そもそもが個人の見解のため、はじめのノートはいずれにせよ不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871952671172886542
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 29F4D4483F6EE6D7859A1C1ED3DAF8AF4A28E6890C95E548975476B8C29DB5D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1735357160219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187195267117288654229F4D4483F6EE6D7859A1C1ED3DAF8AF4A28E6890C95E548975476B8C29DB5D6