Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-28 05:56:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4AF5AA0BA35E419DBE72226555973D41254B1327DA602B5E2B626F37BBFFF87
Participant Details

Original Note:

私見を述べてるに過ぎず、ノートは不要です。 https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/ja/contributing/values なお、ノートに「性加害は認められてない」とありますが、松本側弁護人によって「物的証拠がない」と述べらているのみで、それを以て性加害が認められないというのは論理の飛躍です。 https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20241108/k10014632791000.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871909745596260599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A4AF5AA0BA35E419DBE72226555973D41254B1327DA602B5E2B626F37BBFFF87
  • createdAtMillis - 1735365410817
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1871909745596260599A4AF5AA0BA35E419DBE72226555973D41254B1327DA602B5E2B626F37BBFFF87