Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-25 06:06:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB3FF9D63BE685094E7F74DB79C3D36103BF4A2D15EC90A0C48CFA2F759285B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

コロナワクチンの接種者と未接種者は客観的な流産率がメタアナリシスレベルで調べられており接種者は有意に低い流産率を流行時に示していた事が報告されていますので、誤解を招く投稿としてノートを記載します。 https://academic.oup.com/trstmh/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/trstmh/trad093/7517742?login=false なお、カンザス州の妊娠に関する主張とその誤謬は、下記の公開CNで解説されています。 https://x.com/i/birdwatch/t/1806481134580314187

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871774989911036367
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB3FF9D63BE685094E7F74DB79C3D36103BF4A2D15EC90A0C48CFA2F759285B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1735106790617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1871774989911036367DB3FF9D63BE685094E7F74DB79C3D36103BF4A2D15EC90A0C48CFA2F759285B3