Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-25 01:29:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41D2B64DD54F5E7C385D3D4B62029762A192F2FDD5B0AC588F6E39A190C7B44B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This plotting is a misrepresentation of the paper. The 62% is an ensemble of TTT + BARC on the public validation set and doesn’t imply any score on the harder semi-private v1. https://x.com/goodside/status/1871616584693023129

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871658116800266481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41D2B64DD54F5E7C385D3D4B62029762A192F2FDD5B0AC588F6E39A190C7B44B
  • createdAtMillis - 1735090175038
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187165811680026648141D2B64DD54F5E7C385D3D4B62029762A192F2FDD5B0AC588F6E39A190C7B44B