Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-03 06:18:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2C817875DF208F0A2B518C1C8B26378DA8F9AA24A25AAF01709B3188C0717B7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The prospective notes saying the woman was 24 at the time are hilarious. Why? Because no where in the original post is an age given, or referenced. The fact they feel compelled to define her age proves the point of the OP. NNN. But lol…

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871635154302861663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2C817875DF208F0A2B518C1C8B26378DA8F9AA24A25AAF01709B3188C0717B7
  • createdAtMillis - 1735885104235
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1871635154302861663F2C817875DF208F0A2B518C1C8B26378DA8F9AA24A25AAF01709B3188C0717B7