Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 20:22:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D96B24678C0C0CA0573A9736BEFD4638D385327A09F7F52F80230C3EE68CFA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The prospective notes saying the woman was 24 at the time are hilarious. Why? Because no where in the original post is an age given, or referenced. The fact they feel compelled to define her age proves the point of the OP. NNN. But lol…

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871635154302861663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D96B24678C0C0CA0573A9736BEFD4638D385327A09F7F52F80230C3EE68CFA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1735071765680
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18716351543028616637D96B24678C0C0CA0573A9736BEFD4638D385327A09F7F52F80230C3EE68CFA2