Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 23:57:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58561EF3CD44BE59EC7D107DC15509C5EFBA5F8BC24DA5B216A99CB13F3CA633
Participant Details

Original Note:

The prospective notes saying the woman was 24 at the time are hilarious. Why? Because no where in the original post is an age given, or referenced. The fact they feel compelled to define her age proves the point of the OP. NNN. But lol…

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871635154302861663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58561EF3CD44BE59EC7D107DC15509C5EFBA5F8BC24DA5B216A99CB13F3CA633
  • createdAtMillis - 1735084621526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187163515430286166358561EF3CD44BE59EC7D107DC15509C5EFBA5F8BC24DA5B216A99CB13F3CA633