Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 06:50:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A
Participant Details

Original Note:

It wasn’t a smear campaign but natural public backlash after a 6-week trial with evidence that is still accessible, in which a jury unanimously ruled that Amber Heard defamed Johnny Depp with malicious falsehoods about abuse. The verdict legally affirms Depp’s innocence. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5Tkpm4fQICXN9A9o_Ru2KSmuSrI3COII&si=g4Qv5NtVSLRQTo4c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871336074628518014
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A
  • createdAtMillis - 1735023000309
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187133607462851801485ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A