Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-24 09:31:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C3E29640DAD64D97270EA6CA3CDE8D33C501994EE07A52EB6106E7AB57312166
Participant Details

Original Note:

It wasn’t a smear campaign but natural public backlash after a 6-week trial with evidence that is still accessible, in which a jury unanimously ruled that Amber Heard defamed Johnny Depp with malicious falsehoods about abuse. The verdict legally affirms Depp’s innocence. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5Tkpm4fQICXN9A9o_Ru2KSmuSrI3COII&si=g4Qv5NtVSLRQTo4c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1871335674013515940
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C3E29640DAD64D97270EA6CA3CDE8D33C501994EE07A52EB6106E7AB57312166
  • createdAtMillis - 1735032712195
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1871335674013515940C3E29640DAD64D97270EA6CA3CDE8D33C501994EE07A52EB6106E7AB57312166